top of page

Hexagonal Bio-Inspired Grid

part 2.png

Objective

Each team was given a hexagonal frame and tasked with filling that frame with a structure that ensured maximum tensile strength when tested along any of the 3 primary horizontal axes, maximum strength and deformation withstood under a transverse compressive load, and minimal overall material use.

Skills, Software, and Applied Knowledge

- SolidWorks

- Teamwork

- Technical reports

- Research

- Finite element analysis

My Contribution

Throughout this project, I acted as a mediator and coordinator for my other two teammates. Additional responsibilities included researching potential sources of biological inspiration, creating design alternatives in SolidWorks, and writing and presenting the final deliverable.

Process

Problem Description

The biologically inspired hexagonal grid design was created to be stronger and more durable than the grid patterns currently being used under roadways. The main goals were to achieve high force resistance of the structure in tension and bending across the lattice element.

Inspiration and Adaptation

My team’s design inspiration was taken from the nautilus shell. According to one study, nacre, the interior material of a nautilus shell, is the toughest material nature has to offer. The overall profile of the shell replicates a logarithmic spiral.

Bisection of Nautilus Shell with Indicated Logarithmic Spiral

Two general profiles were devised based on this spiral: a symmetrical one that uses a larger radius and a more condensed logarithmic spiral with ribbing.

Finite Element Analysis

Each design was subjected to quasi-static simulation in compressive and tensile loading conditions for a total of eight simulation studies. The goal of the FEA studies was to eliminate stress concentrations by iteratively editing the dimensions and then to pick the best design by studying the peak stresses under each loading condition. Design 2 was chosen due to its low mass and low peak stresses relative to the other designs.

For the final competition, two tensile samples and one compression sample were 3D printed and their performance was judged with reference to the rest of the class.

Test Sample
Yield Strength (pounds-force)
Mass (grams)
Compression Sample
117
8.36
Best Tensile Sample
96.2
14.78

Based on an equation derived to calculate the yield strength versus the mass of the part, my team came in first place for all the categories (total score, tensile score, and bending score).

Comments

I had a lot of fun working on this project with my team. Through iterative design and hard work, we got first place in all categories, with our closest contender being 567 points below us. As it is, this project was supposed to be a miniature design problem. If we had more time to iterate, I would have liked to try fabrication with a sturdier material and manufacturing method to improve our final results.

bottom of page